My grading practices have improved this year. I'm keeping better track of information, I'm using it more often, and I'm showing students - constantly - their progress in their learning. The notion that grades only report ability is buried deep and digging it out has taken a lot - a lot - of work.
Case in point: I've already written about keeping better track of quizzes given on standards in class. That spreadsheet, at the end of the chapter, looks like this:
This shows some interesting things:
- I can pinpoint sticking points on specific students much more accurately.
- Blank spots - missing quizzes - really hurts my ability to help. Same idea as GIGO...if I don't have consistent information from students, I can't help them as effectively.
- These quiz scores typically improve over time because older ideas set the foundation for new ideas. Yes, there is a dip in some cases, but I chalk that up to complexity rather than ability.
We just took the test and I found myself much less surprised than I used to be. (It pains me to even admit that I used to be surprised...growth...) I can also whip that tracking chart back out and pair it up with test scores.
Yellow is a set of questions related to a specific learning objective for the chapter. For the most part, the yellow boxes correlate with the tracking page. The conversation now centers on, "What mistakes am I still making?" rather than, "What do I have to do to get my grade up?"
It's also great to ask a student if their test grade is a surprise and have them - even the most reluctant or disengaged - admit that no, it looks about right. Again, we can then focus on closing gaps in understanding and not point grubbing.