A “Radical New Teaching Model” That is Missing the Point

Wired business had an article come out earlier this month about a small school in Mexico that saw huge gains in learning because of some computers put in the classroom. If you haven't seen it, you can read it here.

Because Wired is wildly popular and because education is kind of a hot topic right now, this article has been making some waves. Even in the office, it made its rounds as a fantastic idea that schools are behind on. The teacher in me welled up and wrote a preachy soapboxy email to the group passing it, and I figured I would post it here as well.

I'd read this article earlier this week. It's a fantastic, heartwarming story, but I do want to make one comment (this is the teacher in me talking now)…

Gupta downplays the role of the teacher. While on the surface, this looks appealing for a lot of reasons. Students can explore on their own without the dictator at the front of the room. They can work collaboratively, problem solving and self-democratizing. This is all great, but having a teacher is still important (and that's not because I'm a teacher at heart). All of this can be done, but the role of the teacher is to provide context for the content. Anyone can get online and look up facts about the moon, DNA, or the French Revolution. What is missing is a facilitator providing context to the flow of information we get from the Internet. There have been plenty of times students are learning the content, but then fall flat on their face when they try to explain it because there is no good way to put information into a box, nice and neat.

I saw my job in the classroom as being a content resource, yes. More importantly, I could ask the probing questions and listen critically to what students were saying back to me. I'm sure Correa was doing that in his classroom, but not brought out in the article. Consider the number of times you get up and talk to someone here who knows more than you do about a task you're trying to accomplish. You can read StackOverflow and forums all day and still not be able to accomplish the task. It's the same thing internships are set up to do. We don't call each other teachers, but we all teach a little bit each day.

I'm not trying to rant against the article…it's a fantastic story of success against really stacked odds. I'm glad to see stories like this getting press and some time in front of people who might never hear them, but I'm worried that the trend of downplaying the role of educators is going to continue.

Ok, I'm done soapboxing. Thanks for indulging me.

Yes, computers are great at finding information. But, it still takes the wisdom and experience of teachers to put that content into context, and that's the valuable lesson here.

5 thoughts on “A “Radical New Teaching Model” That is Missing the Point

  1. Ariel Margolis says:

    I agree with your position! The teacher has moved from being the “sage” and source of all knowledge to the facilitator. Simply letting students explore is important, but they need guidance and with the push of individualized and personalized learning, the “guidance” is based on the students’ strengths and needs as well as the interests. So, in a way, it is harder to be a teacher in that we need to REALLY know the primary stakeholders – that is, our students. We need to know their learning styles, their multiple intelligences, their interests, their fears, their passions, their skills. We need to embrace each of those qualities and help them learn both the essential skills and content for them to become contributors to today’s society. Students (at any age) cannot do that without guidance. It is why good teachers are also learners – we all have PLNs, CoPs, and Mentors whom we can ask and receive guidance.

  2. Doug Ragan says:

    Well said. Thanks.

  3. Laura says:

    Mr. Bennett,
    I agree completely with your opinion. In fact, I’d go a little further to say that not only do teachers contextualize knowledge, they also filter it. Without a guide, students will stumble upon ineffective, inaccurate, or inappropriate materials.
    Thank you for sharing!
    Laura, South Alabama student, EDM310 student

  4. Keri Brown says:

    Hello Mr. Bennett,
    My name is Keri Brown. I am a student in EDM310 at the University of South Alabama. In this course we are currently learning how to incorporate technology into our future classrooms. I definitely agree with your post though. I think it is necessary for students to have the teacher their to guide and support the facts that they are seeing by using technology. I know more things are moving towards technology but we still need our educators to be the main role in education.
    Thank you!
    Keri Brown

  5. […] his “hole in the wall” project, which hints at the idea that teachers are obsolete. I’m struggling with that idea.. Two things I’ve realized: 1) How presumptuous am I to think that I know better than an […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *